Programmes
Capability we build with you, then leave behind.
Eight pieces of work that make up the AI capability portfolio. Each one stands on its own, and each one is designed so the ability stays with your people rather than with us.
AI Policy & Governance
A policy that gets used, not just filed
A board-endorsed AI use policy grounded in the Privacy Act 2020 and MBIE’s Responsible AI Guidance, with a review cycle, an owner and an escalation path so it stays alive.
Read about the framework →Digital Foundations
You’re probably already paying for this
A data and knowledge audit that maps what your organisation holds and where, then switches on the AI capability already sitting unused in your Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace licences.
Read about the service →Admin & Reporting Toolkit
Write it once, use it everywhere
Your own master facts document plus templates for board papers, meeting summaries and routine correspondence, so the same facts stop being retyped and re-checked every time.
Read about the toolkit →Funder & Grant Reporting
The same facts, every funder’s format
Write your facts once and turn them into every funder report and grant application on every funder’s own cycle, with a tracker so nothing quietly comes due.
Read about the assistant →Fundraising & Donor Toolkit
Better odds on the funding that exists
Support drafting appeals, campaign content and donor communications, including the hardest messages to write: funding shortfalls, service changes, and everything that deserves more care than a rushed first draft.
Read about the toolkit →AI Champions
Capability that doesn’t leave when one person does
One or two internal champions identified and supported over time, so capability spreads through your organisation instead of depending on us, or on a single staff member.
Read about the programme →Implementation Roadmap
Move past one-off fixes, on purpose
A sequenced four-phase plan across quick wins, pilots, organisation-wide deployment and longer-term change, scoped to where you actually are rather than where a generic plan assumes you are.
Read about the roadmap →Community of Practice
You’re not the only one solving this alone
A peer network for operations managers, finance leads and board members: shared templates, quarterly sessions and structured peer learning, facilitated but not dominated by us.
Read about the network →For schools and kura
Professional learning, separately.
Schools sit slightly apart from the capability portfolio. For boards, leaders, teaching staff and learning support teams we run PLD sessions instead, from a single twilight session through to an ongoing whole-school programme.
Programmes, products or services?
Which one you need depends on the job.
A programme makes sense when the thing you need is capability rather than software: a policy your board will actually endorse, a reporting habit that holds, people inside your organisation who can carry it on.
A product makes sense when the work is the same one every organisation is doing by hand. A service makes sense when the work is particular to you: your systems, your funders, your way of operating.
Not sure which? That’s a normal place to start, and it’s exactly what the readiness assessment is for.
Start with whichever one is bothering you most.
You don’t need the whole portfolio, and most organisations don’t start with the roadmap. Tell us what’s taking the most time and we’ll say honestly which piece fits.